(This was actually written on March 12, but forgot to hit 'Publish')
What is going on with the proliferation of so many gun nuts in this country. What is with the illogical and emotionally charged rhetoric from the self appointed ‘champions of safety and wellbeing’ and the ‘defenders’ of our nation’s youth. You know the ones I’m talking about. Those who desire to change our nationstate made up statistics that have no basis in reality.
Case in point, when rape survivor Amanda Collins, who bravely addressed the Colorado legislative hearing regarding its proposed ban on concealed firearms, Sen. Evie Hudak (D – CO) chimed in with “actually, statistics are not on your side, even if you had a gun, …for every one woman who used a handgun to kill someone in self-defense, 83 were murdered by them.”
(View Video)
The Senator’s stats may say that, but the facts do not side with her. According to the FBI, Americans use firearms in self defense 2.1 million times annually. Cases where firearms are used criminally amount to 579,000. Seventy percent of those cases are carried out by criminal repeat offenders.
These gun nuts are so freaked out about firearms they present some of the most bizarre methods of defense imaginable. We’ve been told that a woman carrying a whistle is safer than one who ‘conceal carries’. (“It’s why we have call boxes, it’s why we have safe zones, it’s why we have the whistles.” CO State Rep. Joe Salazar D – Thornton). In an era when 1 out of 5 young women are raped on college campuses, they have been instructed to pee and/or vomit on the attacker; tell the attacker they have a disease or are menstruating; and if that doesn’t work, they are to yell, hit and bite. Talk about a war on women.
But these gun nuts aren’t content in just taking law abiding citizen’s defense away, they are brainwashing a whole generation on the ‘evils of anything gun’.
In Florida, three high school students put themselves at risk to disarm a young man who was pointing a loaded gun at the head of another student. The culprit was arrested. The heroes who reacted and possibly saved another student’s life were suspended. Yeah, that’s right. The Cypress Lake High School in Fort Myers, Florida, suspended the three brave students for having been involved in an incident involving a weapon. One of the suspended students was shocked and confused: “How are they going to suspend me for doing the right thing?”
The school justified the suspension, which lasted for the rest of the week, on the ground that the students who prevented a deadly shooting were part of an “incident” involving a weapon. Alberto Rodriquez, speaking on behalf of the Lee County School District, stated that “If there is a potentially dangerous situation, Florida law allows the principal to suspend a student immediately pending hearing.” To bad the law doesn’t ‘allow’ removal of administrators for blatant stupidity.
In the wake of the Sandy Hook shooting, schools around the country have reacted with indecorous hysterics at the slightest hint of “gun possession.” And there doesn’t even need to be any actual guns involved for the schools to act.
When 9-year-old Hunter Fountain’s mother brought 30 homemade cupcakes to Schall Elementary school in Caro, Michigan, each decorated with two-inch high toy soldiers, the school principal removed the soldiers from the cupcakes. Why? Because the toy soldiers were “insensitive.”
In mid-February, a seven-year-old boy in Loveland, Colorado was suspended from school after throwing an imaginary grenade at a box that had imaginary bad guys. According to Mary Blair Elementary School, the boy broke the school’s rigid rule against pretend weapons and pretend fighting. Wish there was a ‘rigid rule’ against pretend education that plagues too many American public schools.
One would think that this “make-believe grenade” incident, which was widely ridiculed, would have halted the schools’ mad rush to expel imaginary guns, but no such luck.
7-year-old Josh Welch was trying to make a mountain with his strawberry pastry, one bite at a time. He ended up with a squished mess that was said to look like a gun. What did the Baltimore Park Elementary School in Maryland do? Yep, they suspended him for two days on the ground that he “used food to make an inappropriate gesture”.
But that’s not the end of this litany of stupid. As if their hysteria wasn’t enough, a short time later the school sent a letter home with the students informing the parents that, due to their children possibly being traumatized by this “gun” incident, the school offered counseling.
Right. We now need to counsel our children against the trauma of seeing a kid make a mess of his Pop Tart.
But wait, there’s more food violence from our little psychopaths. A ten-year-old boy at the David Youree Elementary School in Smyrna, Tennessee, was punished with social isolation at lunch time because he brandished a pizza slice at his school friends. It wasn’t just any pizza slice, of course. As Nashville’s News 2 Investigates reported, it was a slice of pizza that after David took a few bites of, vaguely looked like a gun. When a fellow student commented on the slice’s resemblance to a gun, the ten-year-old picked it up and pretended to fire shots into the air. School officials, terrified by the danger the pizza posed, suspended him.
James Evans, the Rutherford County School District spokesman, said, “students reported he was making some threatening hand gestures, that he was shooting other kids at the table.” Worse, when school officials interrogated him, he denied that he’d done anything wrong. He obviously didn’t know that it’s a crime to make-believe.
Few would argue that schools need to take shooting threats seriously. But what if it’s not even a threat? What if it’s just a perceived (as in manufactured) threat. What if it’s from a five-year-old girl, who’s talking about using a bubble gun that she had at home? Well of course the culprit must be suspended.
This was the stance of the Mount Carmel Area School District in Pennsylvania, where a 5-year-old girl told a classmate that she wanted to shoot herself and a friend, with her pink “Hello Kitty” cartoon-ray shaped bubble blower. All the little girl wanted to do was blow bubbles on herself and her friend.
Proving that there’s no stupid like liberal administrator stupid, the school termed the “incident” a terroristic threat,” searched the girl’s person, (even though she truthfully told them that her “gun” was at home), threatened her with arrest, yelled at her in front of her classmates, and then suspended her for 10 days.
In Maryland, again, two six-year-olds in kindergarten were suspended for one day. Their crime? During recess, they pointed their fingers at each other while playing “cops and robbers.”
Then there’s Sumter County School District in Sumter, South Carolina. For show-and-tell, a six-year-old girl brought a broken, transparent plastic airsoft gun that contained some easily-seen soft plastic bullets to her school. If this toy really had upset the teacher, she should have placed it in her desk for being inappropriate, and returned it to the little lady at the end of the day.
Unfortunately, we no longer live in a rational world. The teacher confiscated the toy and the administration called the police, who threatened the little girl with arrest if she dared to set foot on school grounds for the rest of the semester.
I could go on and on, but hopefully you get the point. By observing the actions of our public schools, and not just with the above subject, but an assortment of other subjects, it appears they are hell bent on promoting increased illiteracy, violence, and entitlements; while pushing forward the decline of innovation, motivation, and self reliance.
When I was in school, we were taught ‘how’ to think. Now our children are taught ‘what’ to think. This causes the elimination of true debate. When young boys and girls are praised for doing nothing but showing up, and publicly ridiculed and punished for playing make believe, we eliminate individual thought. Arguments are just regurgitated talking points force fed to our youngsters. Now, instead of looking at the whole story, forming an honest opinion, and citing facts, they take any opposition as a personal attack, to which they react with emotional outbursts and insults.
But we can’t completely fault our teachers. Many are fine caring individuals. But their hands are tied. No, the blame falls on us, the parents. We allowed for the nationalization of our education system. This took it out of the local level (the parents) and put it in the hands of bureaucrats. We also drank in the notion that we (parents, grand-parents, etc.) are incapable of overseeing the education of our children.